The word robot was coined by Czech playwright Karel Capek in 1920. In "Rossum's Universal Robots," Capek imagines an artificial, fully functional servant. Yet for most of the history of robot development, they have always been dumb, vulgar mechanics in factories, out of sight.
Mae pethau'n dechrau newid. Mae arloesedd cyflym ffonau smart wedi dod â chamerâu a synwyryddion rhad, cyfathrebu diwifr cyflym, sglodion cyfrifiadurol pwerus a bach iawn, ac mae robotiaid wedi elwa ohonynt. Mae datblygiadau diweddar mewn dysgu peirianyddol wedi galluogi meddalwedd robotiaid i ddeall eu hamgylchedd yn well a gwneud penderfyniadau gwybodus. Mae robotiaid yn symud o leoliadau ffatri a reolir yn ofalus i fywyd bob dydd, gyda chymwysiadau ar fin ehangu mewn archfarchnadoedd, clinigau, nawdd cymdeithasol a mwy yn yr ychydig flynyddoedd nesaf.
The timing of the robot's arrival is just right. Many factories are facing labor shortages—demand for workers has recovered much faster than expected due to the changing circumstances of the pandemic, while some people (especially in the U.S.) have left the workforce. Thanks to the boom in e-commerce, cargo space has grown rapidly. Robots are now integral to picking items from shelves and helping people pack (exponentially growing) packages. They even started moving slowly along sidewalks, delivering goods or food to people's doorsteps. In a world ravaged by the pandemic, where workers are in short supply and there are many elderly people to take care of, having more robots to boost productivity is a good thing.
Ond mae rhai robotiaid yn ofni y bydd yn dinistrio swyddi. Cyhoeddodd economegwyr Prifysgol Rhydychen bapur yn 2013 a gafodd ei gamddehongli gan ddweud bod 47 y cant o swyddi’r Unol Daleithiau mewn perygl o gael eu hawtomeiddio.
In fact, fears of mass unemployment are overblown. Evidence shows that robots are disruptive to the labor market, but ultimately beneficial. Japan and South Korea have the highest penetration rates for robots, but the labor market is also strong. Yale University studied Japan's manufacturing industry from 1978 to 2017 and found that adding 1 robot unit for every 1,000 workers could increase a company's employment by 2.2 percent. Research by the Bank of Korea found that robotization shifted jobs from manufacturing to other industries, but did not reduce total employment. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and others have studied Finnish companies and found that their use of advanced technology has led to an increase in hiring.
All of this suggests that the arrival of robots will bring dramatic changes to jobs, as will the skills and companies that can benefit, but not the catastrophe many feared. An example of a so-called "bad automation" is self-checkout in supermarkets, because it replaces manual labor. But it's not the end of the world at all—robots can do unpleasant or contemptible jobs like slaughtering. Retrained supermarket cashiers can help customers pick items from aisle shelves, and may even find that dealing with people in need is more rewarding than scanning barcodes in front of a laser machine all day.
Yn anochel, hyd yn oed os yw robotiaid o fudd i gymdeithas gyfan, bydd rhai pobl yn dioddef o newid. Un o wersi globaleiddio rhyddfrydol yn y 1990au a'r 2000au oedd, hyd yn oed gyda manteision enfawr y cynnydd mewn masnach, roedd yna adwaith gwleidyddol oherwydd bod y collwyr yn teimlo eu bod wedi'u gadael. Dyma un rheswm pam mae'n rhaid i gwmnïau a llywodraethau gydnabod gwerth ailhyfforddi a dysgu gydol oes. Wrth i swyddi newid, mae gweithwyr yn haeddu help i ennill sgiliau newydd, gan gynnwys sut i weithio gyda'r nifer cynyddol o gydweithwyr robotig a sut i'w rheoli.
The potential gains from the robotics revolution are huge. In Capek's play, robots rebel against their human masters, causing mass unemployment and worse. In the real world, the robot's beginning doesn't line up with Capek's satire, and there's certainly no reason to think the end would be the same.